Skip to content

You are using an outdated browser

Internet Explorer is not supported by this site and Microsfot has stopped releasing updates, therefore you may encounter issues whilst visiting this site and we strongly recommend that you upgrade your browser for modern web functionality, a better user experience and improved security.

Upgrade my browser

‘Historic win’ as NSW environment court rejects Bylong Valley coal mine

Source: Liv Casben/ABC-NEWS

New South Wales Land and Environment Court upholds decision by the state’s Independent Planning Commission to reject controversial coal mine planned for rich farmland north-west of Sydney.

Activists hail ‘historic win’ as court rejects Bylong Valley coal mine

The development of an underground and open-cut coal mine in the Bylong Valley will not be allowed to proceed after a ruling in the NSW land and environment court earlier this month, as reported by The Guardian.

In what environmental campaigners described as a historic win, the court on Friday 18 December upheld a decision by the state’s Independent Planning Commission (IPC) to reject Korean energy giant KEPCO’s proposal for a mine that would extract up to 120m tonnes of coal over 25 years for export.

The IPC refused development approval for the project last year citing the unacceptable impact the mine would have on the environment – including through greenhouse gas emissions – and the costs to future generations.

The court’s decision to dismiss the appeal was welcomed by farmers and other groups opposed to a new open-cut mine in the farming region near Mudgee.
Third-generation farmer Peter Grieve, whose farm is in the Bylong Valley, is among those opposed to plans for a coal mine in his region. The court’s decision to dismiss the appeal was welcomed by farmers and other groups opposed to a new open-cut mine in the farming region near Mudgee. Source: Peter Rae/SydneyMorningHerald

“no way” Bylong should ever have been made available for mining

The New South Wales Land and Environment Court has upheld a decision by the state’s Independent Planning Commission to reject a controversial coal mine planned for rich farmland north-west of Sydney, the Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday 18 December, after the hearing.

Korean energy giant KEPCO had been seeking to overturn the decision in September 2019 to reject a proposed coal mine for the Bylong Valley because of “long-lasting environmental, agricultural and heritage impacts”.

The court’s decision to dismiss the appeal was welcomed by farmers and other groups opposed to a new open-cut mine in the farming region near Mudgee.

The Bylong Valley Protection Alliance – set up by the local community – had to step in to defend the decision in court after the commission opted not to back its own verdict.

“This court decision reaffirms what we locals always knew – that the IPC was right when it ruled the agricultural values of this valley are too precious to sacrifice for the sake of a temporary, destructive coal mine,” Phillip Kennedy, the alliance’s president, said.

“The soils in this valley are classed as the top 3.5 per cent in the state. There’s no way it should ever have been made available for mining by the government.”

A spokesman for KEPCO Bylong said the company was “very disappointed that the court did not find in favour of the project and the strong case it made for overturning the refusal by the [IPC].”

“KEPCO will now take some time to review the decision of the court and decide the future direction of the project,” he said.

Source: SydneyMorningHerald

The IPC found the mine was contrary to the principles of ecologically sustainable development and would have unacceptable impacts on the Bylong Valley. The court has confirmed the IPC’s refusal was lawful.
The community provided robust scientific evidence to the IPC on the detrimental environmental, social and economic impacts of the proposal to build a new coalmine in a highly productive agricultural area. The IPC found the mine was contrary to the principles of ecologically sustainable development and would have unacceptable impacts on the Bylong Valley. The court has confirmed the IPC’s refusal was lawful. Source: Liv Casben/ABC-NEWS

Commission reject mine despite a potential AU$290 million in royalties

The Independent Planning Commission rejected the mine despite the prospect of AU$290 million in royalties and an even larger economic impact on the region.

“The project is not in the public interest because it is contrary to the principles of ESD [ecologically sustainable development] – namely intergenerational equity because the predicted economic benefits would accrue to the present generation but the long-term environmental, heritage and agricultural costs will be borne by the future generations,” the commission said in a statement in September 2019.

The commission’s detailed reasons also cited the likelihood of “long-term declines in groundwater over prolonged dry periods”, with a drawdown in groundwater reaching as much as nine metres in one area.

Rana Koroglu, managing lawyer for the Environmental Defenders Office in NSW which acted for the alliance, said the local community had fought for five years to save their valley.

“The community provided robust scientific evidence to the IPC on the detrimental environmental, social and economic impacts of the proposal to build a new coal mine in a highly productive agricultural area,” she said.

Mr Kennedy said the NSW Berejiklian should permanently bar mining in the Bylong Valley, and protect its farming through legislation.

“We also call on KEPCO to sell the 30,000 acres it bought in the valley back to the people so this region can once again be the strong farming community it used to be,” he said. 

Read the court’s reasons in full here.

Source: SydneyMorningHerald

The IPC refused development approval for the project last year citing the unacceptable impact the mine would have on the environment – including through greenhouse gas emissions – and the costs to future generations.
Kepco’s proposal was for a mine that would extract up to 120m tonnes of coal over 25 years for export. The IPC refused development approval for the project last year citing the unacceptable impact the mine would have on the environment – including through greenhouse gas emissions – and the costs to future generations. Source: Liv Casben/ABC-NEWS
Make an Impact

RENEWABLE ENERGY GUIDE (FOR THE SELF-BUILDER)

With sustainability high on the agenda of many self builders, it is important to know what types of renewable energy systems are available. Here, we look at different energy sources and their applications, including costs and suitability.